M. Johnson
Minhines was deat
not in 1898. His of rement Sam him the right to remist but the taste was not mentioned and was left to the Colomar fort to devide.
Ais has
az
معس
d 2
allowed to ruine
4 /1⁄2th during his former
enpayment it is not probable
that he worror ape to lear farruable terms row
in.
Mr Meade 27/5/62. This man had no right to remit at 4/2, boat as he
was Engaged subsequent to 1876
oddele
This agreement said nothing about
plaid Specials
mat]
it. Indeed a clause was added to
the
A
381
nent never.
agreement (which Iinspected today) to the effect that he should have no claim to compensation in respect of any change in value of the Dollar in the Colay.
But the Hongkong fovernment theless allowed him to remit at 1/2, as is shewn by the fact that he was
month remitting £ 9.7.6d.
80
a
c.a.
(467/9/17)
Bal
whereas his agreement Entitled min to remit #45 (= £9.7. at 4/2) It appears that Mr Minhunnett will only go out on same terms as before,
course he understands same by which of course treatment as to Remittancer, althoug he had no
right before to remit at 4/2. Mr Price thinks the man wedd
his terno. well worth Engaging
Even
JA
own
? Accept the man's terms in this respect, and in informing M. Marsh that this has been done as an exceptional case,
hin
of the despatch
on
remind 175
420/46
176
requesting which directs that nome Engaged after the date of that degrated are to have the privilege of remitty
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.